Action in algorithms /
Ação em algoritmos:
Algorithms in projects /
Algoritmos em projetos. 2 August / ago. 2019.
Claims in practice Education /
Educação Reivindicações em prática:
2019.
First edition: March - June,
Second edition: August - November /
Primeira edição: março - junho,
Segunda edição: agosto - novembro. Education enacted from the
production platform indicated in
2019 Scorecard / Educação concretizada a partir da
plataforma de produção indicada em
pontos 2019, 2 August / ago. 2019. Available from / Disponível em <
http://www.ilanet.com.br/cgi-local/portal/bin/view/Ilanet/ActionInAlgorithms?skin=print.pattern >. access on / Acesso em 2 August / ago. 2019.
| "[...] there are three fundamental categories of computational behaviors in a software system: a) Computational operations for variable manipulations, b) Timing operations for event manipulation, and c) Space operations for memory manipulation [...]" (Wang, 2008). | "[...] existem três categorias fundamentais de comportamentos computacionais em um sistema de software: a) Operações computacionais para manipulação de variáveis, b) Operações de tempo para manipulação de eventos, e, c) Operações espaciais para manipulação de memória [...]" (Wang, 2008). |
| Language in algorithm, Behaviors of concurrent systems, Logical reasoning, Model-based designs, Failure of education, Formal methods, Programming | Linguagem em algoritmo, Comportamentos de sistemas concorrentes, Raciocínio lógico, Esquemas baseados em modelos, Falha de educação, Métodos formais, Programação |
Keywords:
algorithm in cohesiveness,
algorithm in outcomes,
algorithm in governance,
collaboration in profit,
concurrent computing,
outcomes in action,
software collaboration,
automation system
Português:
ação em algoritmos
Outcomes:
2019
Claims in practice education 2019 /
Educação Reivindicações em prática 2019:
Risks in linkages /
Riscos em vínculos.
First edition: March - June,
Second edition: August - November /
Primeira edição: março - junho,
Segunda edição: agosto - novembro. Education enacted from the
production platform indicated in
2019 Scorecard / Educação concretizada a partir da
plataforma de produção indicada em
pontos 2019, 26 December / dez. 2018. Available from / Disponível em <
http://www.ilanet.com.br/cgi-local/portal/bin/view/Ilanet/ClaimsInPracticeEducation?skin=print.pattern >. access on / Acesso em 26 December / dez. 2018.
HEETER, Carrie; MAGERKO, Brian; MEDLER, Ben; FITZGERALD, Joe. Game Design and the Challenge-Avoiding Impression Manager Player Type, July 12, 2008. Available from <
http://adam.cc.gatech.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/challenge-avoider-meaningfulplay.pdf >. access on 21 July 2013.
MACE, Michael. Google logic: why Google does the things it does the way it does: Puzzled about why Google closes successful products such as Reader while backing others such as self-driving cars? A former Apple and Palm executive explains. Available from <
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/jul/09/google-android-reader-why >. access on 20 July 2013.
OREMUS, Will. Who Controls Your Facebook Feed. A small team of engineers in Menlo Park. A panel of anonymous power users around the world. And, increasingly, you. Available from <
http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/cover_story/2016/01/how_facebook_s_news_feed_algorithm_works.single.html >. access on 22 January 2016.
Simplicity is the goal. Available from <
http://www.lessonsoffailure.com/tag/knuth/ >. access on 23 May 2019.
Somers, James. The Coming Software Apocalypse: A small group of programmers wants to change how we code—before catastrophe strikes, Sep 26, 2017. Available from <
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/09/saving-the-world-from-code/540393/ >. access on 26 April 2019.
Temporal logic of actions. Available from <
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temporal_logic_of_actions >. access on 23 May 2019.
Updating governance / Governança que atualiza:
Global Challenge /
Desafio global. Remodelling Global Cooperation:
Claims in practice 2017 / Remodelando a Cooperação Global:
Reivindicações em prática 2017. Forming a coalition of people to develop a competition entry. / Formando uma coalizão de pessoas para desenvolver uma entrada de competição, 21 September / set. 2017. Available from / Disponível em <
http://www.ilanet.com.br/cgi-local/portal/bin/view/Ilanet/UpdatingGovernance?skin=print.pattern >. access on / Acesso em 21 September / set. 2017.
Viholainen, Antti. Incoherence of a concept image and erroneous conclusions in the case of differentiability. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Jyväskylä (Finland). The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, ISSN 1551-3440, Vol. 5, nos.2&3, pp.231-248 2008 ©Montana Council of Teachers of Mathematics & Information Age Publishing. Available from <
http://scholarworks.umt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1124&context=tme >. access on 17 June 2016.
Who pays for science? Available from <
https://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/who_pays >. access on 20 May 2019.
YANAY, N., The Social Construction of Autonomy: A Motivational Model Social Behavior and Personality,
Society for Personality Research (Inc.), 22(3), 209-226, 1994.
--
GregorioIvanoff - 26 May 2019
to top