Standard-setting code; additional requirements: Difference between standard-setting institution and standard-setting organisation, considering that organisation should be viewed as process; Possibility of sustainability standards being applied in services and also in knowledge intensive industries; Concept relationship between standard relevance and policy relevance (considering the influence of corruption).
Additional criteria and the desired outcomes they are linked to: Promoting standards from credible sustainability policies derived from
strategy-as-practice.
Redundant or repetitive issues: The term social should not to include issues of economic viability. Issues are related to different but related "regions". Environmental and infrastructure region: Natural resources, urbanization and the ecological aspects; Critical infrastructure (namely communications, energy, transport, water and health) / Governance region: Institutions, government, leadership, policies and the rule of law / Social region: Human capital, health, the community and the individual /
Economic region: Macroeconomic environment,
goods and
services market,
financial market,
labour market,
sustainability and
productivity. The expression "standard-setting processes" should be revised simply to "standard-setting".
Criteria to desired outcomes linking approach: A deeper organizational analysis should be conducted. The organizational analysis should take into consideration different alternatives of the organizational process, organizational constraints, risks and damages.
Keywords:
standard setting organisations,
genetically modified food,
high velocity market,
policy development games,
inter-institutional coordination,
inter-institutional regulation,
regulation in communication,
credibility in governance,
certification in governance,
code in practice,
sustainable energy,
best practices,
language regulation,
context dynamics,
knowledge view,
health management,
credible claims,
creative economy, international trade, market map,
policy relevance,
organizational practices,
ethical standards,
online practices,
corruption,
sustainability,
countries,
services,
agency,
rhythm,
risks,
Malcolm Gladwell,
Iseal Alliance
Português:
instituição de estabelecimento de padrões
AXELOS Global Best Practice. Available from <
https://www.axelos.com/ >. access on 25 July 2015.
CUPE International. Best Practices – which qualification to choose? Available from <
http://www.cupeinternational.com/best-practices-which-qualification-to-choose-2/ >. access on 25 July 2015.
Greenwich Mean Time. Disponível em <
http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenwich_Mean_Time >. Acesso em 16 nov. 2013.
ISEAL Code Development Procedure P045, Version 1.0, January, 2010. Available from <
http://www.isealalliance.org/sites/default/files/P045%20ISEAL%20Code%20Development%20Procedure%20v1.0%20Jan10.pdf >. access on 14 November 2013.
ISEAL Standard-Setting Code Revision: Code version 5.1 and Comment Form. Available from <
http://www.isealalliance.org/online-community/resources/iseal-standard-setting-code-revision-code-version-51-and-comment-form >. access on 15 November 2013.
Lisbon and LxCRAS work for conservation. Available from <
http://www.youtube.com/embed/v56VNOVhpoU >. access on 12 November 2013.
Standard-Setting Code Revision. Available from <
http://www.iseal.org/standardsettingrevision >. access on 14 November 2013.
http://scholar.google.com.br/scholar?q=%22standard-setting+institution%22+sustainability+%22competitive+advantage%22+%22in+services%22&btnG=&hl=pt-BR&as_sdt=0%2C5
http://www.google.com.br/search?hl=pt-BR&q=orientation+%22standard-setting%22+institution&btnG=Pesquisar
Number of topics:
17
Number of topics:
4
Number of topics:
4
Number of topics:
11
--
GregorioIvanoff - 12 Nov 2013
to top